| Brett 1: Jens Patommel | Brett 5: Norbert Weibes |
| Brett 2: Christoph Hollender | Brett 6: Harald Brando |
| Brett 3: Hans-Joachim Runkel | Brett 7: Herbert Caumanns |
| Brett 4: Michael Oehlers | Brett 8: Paul Küllertz |
| Abschlußtabelle | ||||||
| MP | BP | g | u | v | ||
| 1. | SG Krefeld | 25 | 54 : 18 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| 2. | Sfr. Süchteln | 21 | 44½ : 27½ | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| 3. | WSB Krefeld | 19 | 44½ : 27½ | 6 | 1 | 2 |
| 4. | SC Springer St. Tönis II | 16 | 39 : 32 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| 5. | SK Turm Krefeld V | 13 | 38 : 34 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| 6. | SV Grefrath | 10 | 33½ : 38½ | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| 7. | Concordia Viersen II | 9 | 34½ : 37½ | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 8. | SC Bayer Uerdingen III | 6 | 26½ : 44½ | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| 9. | SC Bayer Uerdingen II | 6 | 21½ : 50½ | 2 | 0 | 7 |
| 10. | Sgm. Rochade Oppum | 5 | 23 : 49 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
Damit hat die SG Krefeld den Aufstieg in die Bezirksliga geschafft.
Unseren herzlichen Glückwunsch!
Der SC Bayer Uerdingen hat seine 3. Mannschaft aus der Bezirksklasse zurückgezogen.
| Saison 2001 / 2002 | |||||||||||||||
| Mannschaft | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | BP | MP | |||
| 1 | SG Krefeld | × | 5 | 5½ | 8 | 6½ | 5½ | 4 | 5 | 6½ | 8 | 54 | 25 | ||
| 2 | Sfr. Süchteln | 3 | × | 5½ | 7 | 5 | 4½ | 3½ | 5½ | 6 | 4½ | 44½ | 21 | ||
| 3 | SK Turm Krefeld V | 2½ | 2½ | × | 4 | 4½ | 3½ | 5 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 38 | 13 | ||
| 4 | Sgm. Rochade Oppum | 0 | 1 | 4 | × | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 2½ | 5½ | 23 | 5 | ||
| 5 | SC Bayer Uerdingen III | 1½ | 3 | 3½ | 5 | × | 2 | 2 | 1½ | 4½ | 3½ | 26½ | 6 | ||
| 6 | Concordia Viersen II | 2½ | 3½ | 4½ | 4 | 6 | × | 3½ | 4 | 4 | 2½ | 34½ | 9 | ||
| 7 | Springer St. Tönis II | 4 | 4½ | 3 | 6 | 5 | 4½ | × | 3 | 3½ | 5½ | 39 | 16 | ||
| 8 | WSB Krefeld | 3 | 2½ | 5 | 7 | 6½ | 4 | 5 | × | 5½ | 6 | 44½ | 19 | ||
| 9 | SV Grefrath | 1½ | 2 | 2 | 5½ | 3½ | 4 | 4½ | 2½ | × | 8 | 33½ | 10 | ||
| 10 | SC Bayer Uerdingen II | 0 | 3½ | 1 | 2½ | 4½ | 5½ | 2½ | 2 | 0 | × | 21½ | 6 | ||
| Spieler | DWZ | 1. Rd. | 2. Rd. | 3. Rd. | 4. Rd. | 5. Rd. | 6. Rd. | 7. Rd. | 8. Rd. | 9. Rd. | % | |||
| 9 | Patommel, Jens | 1839 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 44 % | |||
| 10 | Hollender, Christoph | 1704 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 56 % | ||
| 11 | Runkel, Hans-Joachim | 1774 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 % | ||||
| 12 | Oehlers, Michael | 1786 | 0 | 0 | 1 (kl) | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | 1 | 44 % | |||
| 13 | Weibes, Norbert | 1510 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 25 % | |||
| 14 | Brando, Harald | 1618 | 1 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (kl) | 45 % | ||
| 15 | Caumanns, Herbert | 1639 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 (kl) | 38 % | |||
| 16 | Küllertz, Paul | 1678 | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 84 % | ||
| 17 | Küllertz, Dietmar | 1846 | 1 | |||||||||||
| 18 | Heinrichs, Frank | 1839 | 0 | |||||||||||
| 21 | Alsdorf, Fritz | 1532 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 50 % | |||||||
| 4 | 2½ | 3½ | 4 | 4 | 2½ | 3½ | 4½ | 6 |
| |